Jump to content

Talk:List of skeletal muscles of the human body

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Overlab between information in different columns.

[edit]

with the two rows 'nasalis, alar part' and 'nasalis, transverse part' there seems to be an overlab between the information given in its name and in its location which is inconsistent with how we do it around Rectus, cricothyroid, arytenoid, cricoarytenoid and the still unsetteled Vocalis/thyroarytenoid? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 15:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It also seems strange to have occipitofrontalis as a location specefier in occipitalis and frontalis, no? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 16:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same goes for iliopsoas. It also seems a bit strange to have in the location column? or am i overlooking something? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 19:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
adductor muscles(which occurs from gracilis to adductor minimus) also seems to describe a function rather then a location, even though this occurs in the location column maybe we could move this to the Agonistic relations column? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same goes for adductor magnus Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Levator ani also seems to be a muscle group rather then a location? in iliococcygeus, puboanalis, puboperinealis, puboprostaticus (males) / pubovaginalis (females) and pubococcygeus no? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Often (male), (female) or (male/female) is listed in the location column. This information does seem highly relevant. However location does not seem to be the ideal place for it. Should we prehabs make a new column denoting which gender in which a given muscle can be found? or is there a smarter way to denote this? we could of course only mark the muscles unique to one gender then we have to remove all (male/female) markings. However location still does not seem like the right column to do it in? Maye in the Occurences column? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
dorsal interossei also seems to have foot in its name, even though this infomation seems more appropriate in the location column. Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
foot is a part of abductor digiti minimi (foot) even though that is locational information Claes Lindhardt (talk) 17:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Does it make sense that we have 'iliocostalis thoracis' with the location 'Torso, Back, right/left' when we also have other muscles with the location 'Torso, Back, thoracis, right/left' ?? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As well as longissimus thoracis, spinalis thoracis, multifidus thoracis, interspinales thoracis 1-3, intertransversarii, thoracis 1-9- Should we take the information out of the location column or out of the naming column? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If 'flexor digitorum superficialis' have superficialis in the name, shoulden't 'flexor carpi ulnaris, palmaris longus, flexor carpi radialis and pronator teres' not also have it in thier names? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 12:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems a bit strange that extensor indicis is deep but the rest of the extensor muscles in the upper limb are superficial? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 15:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How may muscles is the hemidiaphragm?

[edit]

Is the hemidiaphragm 1 oe 3 muscles (lumbar/costal/sternal part) and does it really appear twice? or just once? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Table with latin name meaning

[edit]

Would it make sense to make an overview of what the different lating suffixes and prefixes mean? to also make it easier to new commers?

or is that more then the page needs? I feel it might be usefull to have around untill we settle on some muscle naming convenctions and implement them? Also to make clear that multple of these terms kind of mean the same thing, as well as how inconsitent it is how much information a muslce name gives about the actual muscle.

Latin Term Meaning
Brevis short, little
Flexor a muscle whose contraction bends a limb or other part of the body.
Abbductor a muscle whose contraction moves a limb or part away from the midline of the body, or from another part.
Superior Above
Inferior Below, beneth
Dorsal on or relating to the upper side or back of an Organ
minimi small
opponens oppose, or opposite to
digiti finger
minor Smaller version
Major Larger versoin

Claes Lindhardt (talk) 16:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Human anatomy project seems to work around the following terms:
But I cannot find anywhere which is supposed to be used as pre-fix or suffix when? is there a guide to this somewhere that I am overlooking that we could use to make the naming of the muscle uniform? Also it seems to suggest minor, Major, Superior, Anterior, Inferior will always be locational information and thus never belong in the name? but rahter only in the location column? Does it make sense to update the convention to match this? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Visual representation to show orientation of muscles

[edit]

Is there a way in which we could make something like: https://www.caskanatomy.info/browser/html5/fembrowser.html?fbclid=IwAR0sxmZMJ9ez-6ZxAk02G5KKziidEAYAv1QKhe6w6QvoElcOunmsH1yVsUQ but which could be opend in wikipedia, and where when you hover over a certain part a small square appears with the name of the muscle(and then maybe even a link that when you click it, it takes you to that given muscle). Woulden't that be a nice way to provide an easily navigable overview of the muscles in standard human body? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biology

[edit]

bones and muscles 2409:4089:1D43:52F9:0:0:1F8B:A702 (talk) 04:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_skeletal_muscles_of_the_human_body&oldid=1250593851"