Talk:"Weird Al" Yankovic

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the "Weird Al" Yankovic article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8: 30 days

"Weird Al" Yankovic is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 4, 2006.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 29, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 28, 2006	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
November 2, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 8, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
October 12, 2009	Featured article review	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy High‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference ideas for "Weird Al" Yankovic

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Adams, Erik (2013-06-12). "How 'Dog Eat Dog' proves 'Weird Al' Yankovic is a one-man Gateway To Geekery". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on 2022-08-19. Retrieved 2024-01-21.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of WordGirl characters#The Learnerer|The Learnerer]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Proposed merge of Jon Schwartz (drummer) into "Weird Al" Yankovic

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge; independent notability has not been established, but readers are best server by having the topic discussed separately (perhhaps WP:TOOLONG). Klbrain (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for sources since 2012 with zero improvement. Almost no notability outside work with Weird Al. Either merge or AFD. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Masem: @KD5TVI: @SibTower1987: your thoughts on the above mergers? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jay *might* be notable standalone give work outside of working with Weird Al but without sources, should be merged into here, the other two are clear merges. Perhaps a brief "Band" seciton may be worthwhile to consider here. — Masem (t) 00:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of Jay's solo works don't seem to be notable on their own. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hence "might", such that the short should be to merge here but if someone can show those notable or more notability for Jay, it can be respun out. Masem (t) 21:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The amount of merges proposed in the article "Weird Al" Yankovic could potentially overwrite the article, so if I was you, I would not propose the merger of these articles. 92.236.30.187 (talk) 19:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’d agree. There’s too many merge threads for “Wierd Al” Yankovic per now. Please check his site and all the other threads regarding merging as well. 2A02:2121:304:EB3F:B411:423C:EB61:731E (talk) 23:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t Merge - There’s a lot of room for improvement on those individual articles but much of the information unique to those pages would never make sense to include on the Weird Al page. I don’t mind that they’re heavily linked to Weird Al; being longtime collaborators and members of his band grants a degree of notability that warrants far more care to those articles, in my opinion - particularly in obtaining additional sources. DubiousVillain (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge - I don't get why this would matter. There are many cases of things that wouldn't "have notability" without another thing. So if a person has notability, even if it's because of another person, there shouldn't be a problem with having an article about them. CheeseyHead (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t Merge - This page is about Weird Al, not his band. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 09:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Merge 98.11.243.148 (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reason? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Don't Merge Looking at all the gold discs in the image, he is probably notable enough.James Kevin McMahon (talk) 02:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how notability works on WP. You have to demonstrate he's separately notable from Weird Al. Masem (t) 02:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Don't Merge Even though he is not notable without Al, most of the stuff on here would not make sense being on Al's page. It's like how Bryce James is not notable at all without Lebron but still has his own page.Sushidude21! (talk)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Weird Al Show

The Weird Al Show only has three passing mentions (lead, Harvey the Wonder Hamster, TV filmography). It should probably have a couple of sentences with a "main" hatnote in the '90-'97 section and/or the "Other works" section. Mapsax (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing Lead Image (or not)

My edit which changed the lead image from this one to this was reverted by editor Masem. I would like to dispute the revert and present the reasons why I think my edit was justified.

It's a more recent image - The photo I propose depicts Weird Al in 2024, whilst the current image depicts him in 2010.
It's used on other-language Wikipedia articles - The photo I propose is used on the Italian, Russian, Bulgarian, Czech, Albanian and another 11 or so other-language Wikipedia articles, meaning it is considered as a suitable photo as the lead image.
It's a higher resolution image - Not much of an argument (if one at all), but the current image is "only" 400px by 600px, whilst the photo I propose is much higher resolution (~2000px by ~2700px).

I hope we can come to a consesus as quickly as possible. God bless. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense to me. Grant it, I don't know much about how they pick the photos (they're usually not great lol). CheeseyHead (talk) 06:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Bis's newer photo is bigger, newer, and clearer. I see no reason to use otherwise.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support To be honest I don't see the issue with the proposed photo. It's higher quality, much more recent (14 years!), and also shows his face pretty clearly. The status quo might be "better" in terms of looks but I think the proposed photo's benefits outweigh the status quo's. -- Dantus21 (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be zero opposition, so per WP:BOLD I put in the 2024 pic. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]