Talk:Deep web
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deep web article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Iceberg chart
[edit]Seriously? High importance article, level-5 vital article in technology and it includes a poorly made highly scientific "iceberg chart". It adds no value whatsoever to the article and simplifies the subject to such extent that its incorrect. 80.98.26.97 (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I was just about to make the same point. A better alternative would be something that explains how web crawlers or web spiders work. What do you think? MystikMakr (talk) 13:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- In particular, it makes the common mistake of conflating the deep web and the dark web, something the article itself addresses. Messelastur (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've removed the image as it's seriously misleading. Having a diagram on the page would still be helpful though, but I'll let someone else decide what that should be. DigammaOrGamma (talk) 09:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Applications for researchers
[edit]As a college student, I have been attempting to access deep web technologies for research purposes. However, I have not found any leads on Wikipedia. I hope a more knowledgeable individual would add a section in this article. LeonhardEuler27 (talk) 22:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)