Talk:Flag of the United States

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flag of the United States article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 31 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 14, 2004, June 14, 2005, June 14, 2006, June 14, 2007, June 14, 2008, June 14, 2017, and June 14, 2022.

Heraldry and vexillology

Flag of the United States is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

United States Top‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for use on the United States portal.

Prospect Hill flag debate

I haven't looked closely at the article right now, and may not do so for a while, but I'm not sure why a controversy about the flag used on a specific occasion in 1775 (almost two years before the flag which is the topic of this article was first adopted) is important enough to this article to add 1,683 bytes about it. AnonMoos (talk) 07:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It makes some sense. The 1775 event is pretty important to the kind of dorks (me) who get into the history of the design. But, the section is a bit of a jumble and some editor (probably also me) should trim it down. That particular addition of 1,683 bytes is mostly sources, not so much article text. Jno.skinner (talk) 06:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Error in image?

It looks to me like the image of the flag at the top of the article only has 45 stars (nine rows of 5). Is this an error? DavidPBaril (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dpbaril There’s 5 rows of 6 stars and 4 rows of 5 stars. Alexysun (talk) 08:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are now! (2024-08-28) I guess it was corrected after my comment. DavidPBaril (talk) 18:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dpbaril On review, it looks like a rendering problem in the Wikipedia app on my phone. When I click on the image and view the underlying file, it displays the full image with all the stars. But, for some reason, the image displayed in the article view crops out the left edge of the image including the first column of stars. I tried altering the display settings on my phone (Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra) but the image is still truncated. I wonder if anyone else has the same experience. 142.112.242.76 (talk) 20:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stars and Stripes Lafayette

Reference 3 does not confirm that the Marquis de Lafayette coined the phrase "stars and stripes." Is there a source that does? I found nothing with a quick search. 168.91.171.110 (talk) 17:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out. The claim about Lafayette appears quite suspect and anyhow does not belong in the lead section. I have removed it. Jno.skinner (talk) 06:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Fringe Flag

The first paragraph of "DECORATION" says "Citation needed." It's Army Regulation 840-10, 2-3, b & c. That's the ONLY regulation and truly the official regulation describing and codifying "the gold fringe" on the flag. The gold fringe _is_decoration... for a military flag. Not making this connection is doing reads a disservice to humanity.

The Gold fringe doesn't limit the universal law of war jurisdiction of a gold fringe tribunal ("military courtroom", as defined by Army Regulation 840-10, 2-3, b & c4) and Law of War Manual (2023). None of the rulings about "the gold fringe flag" actually contradict Army Regulation 840-10, 2-3, b & c4. Go read them carefully, in legalese.

In Department of Defense Military tribunals, under law of war, against actual officers, They have and use a gold fringe flag as part of Army Regulation 840-10, 2-3, b & c4. In a judicial context, they are "Military Courtroom" Tribunals by law.

Why are "civilian" courts literally using the same gold fringe flag as DoD Military Tribunals on officers? In this light, those "sovereign citizens and tax conspiracy protestors" do actually seem to be pointing to ACTUAL ARMY REGULATION and it's abuse in civilian courts. Are they wrong? Why won't anyone in positions of authority explain why both DoD Military tribunals, under law of war via gold fringe flag, and "civilian courts" use the same gold fringe flag?

Where are our actual legitimate law of peace courts without gold fringe flag? the legal term "DISTRICT", as in "DISTRICT COURT," does seem to have military implications. 98.148.220.167 (talk) 04:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The gold fringe appears to have more importance in certain fringe conspiracy theories than it does in actual U.S. government use of flags. AnonMoos (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Example conspiracy theory: Tax protester conspiracy arguments § Conspiracy arguments in general. –jacobolus (t) 21:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on this very talk page 11 years ago, "It's batshit crazy Sovereign Citizen conspiracy claptrap." --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

书香门第

自從上月22日德州115歲婦人伊莉莎白·法蘭西斯(Elizabeth Francis)逝世後，114歲的賓州居民納奧米·懷海德(Naomi Whitehead)成為美國最年長的人瑞。美聯社報導，懷海德1910年9月26日出生於喬治亞州一處農場，她自稱這一輩子從來不抽菸且滴酒不沾。 close arrow_forward_ios 閱讀文章 pause volume_mute

00:00 00:00 01:23

懷海德比丈夫及三個兒子都還長壽，她覺得自己長壽的祕訣包括：良好的基因，喜歡烹飪、烘焙、繪畫，以及聽音樂等嗜好。懷海德目前住在格林威爾·西塞勒姆(Greenville West Salem)的「聖保祿老年生活社區」(St. Paul's Senior Living Community)，該社區透過臉書(Facebook)發出聲明表示，「社群福祉是健康老化的重要元素，納奧米是個耀眼的榜樣，說明無論我們年紀多大，維持人際關係並成為社區的一分子，都能讓我們的晚年生活更加豐富」。懷海德於2023年9月曾接受「新堡新聞」(New Castle News)訪問，她當時表示，沒有預期自己會活到幾歲，「主讓我活多久，我就會活多久」。懷海德的孫子孫子丹·懷海德(Dan Whitehead)形容，祖母「是一位虔誠的女人，她備受寵幸」。另據「美國廣播公司新聞網」(ABC News)報導，懷海德今年9月獲得共和黨賓州眾議員溫特林(Parke Wentling)的特別褒揚，為她慶生。聯邦疾病防治中心(CDC)數據指出，喬治亞州女性出生時的預期壽命為77.1歲，而賓州女性的平均年齡為79.3歲。另據全球人瑞資料網站「LongeviQuest」數據顯示，目前世上最長壽的女子是日本兵庫縣的116歲人瑞糸岡富子(Tomiko Itooka)，而與懷海德同齡的則是LongeviQuest名單排名世界第五、114歲的法國女性馬里-蘿絲·泰希爾(Marie-Rose Tessier) 张婉琳 (talk) 06:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]